Economics: Bear Stearns sale - trend or glitch?
After previous bailouts have come to nothing, Bear Stearns has at last succumbed to its injuries. It's being bought for the apparently bargain basement figure of USD234 million - that's pocket money compared to the prices passing for social networking websites. Is this an isolated case - or the signs of things to come?
Most Recent - This Section
Business Environment: Letter from Davos - Asia RisingEconomies: Aus Reserve declares end to recession
Economies: crisis moves - literally - from Wall Street to Mainstreet
Economies: double whammy hits tourism and travel
Economies: HK and UK Markets maintain upward trend
Most Recent - Whole Site
The Risk Professional: Green Capital Consulting GroupLegal Professional: Baker Mac lawyer guilty of money laundering and securities fraud
Sales and Marketing: shooting oneself in the foot
Business Crime: Dear Mrs Kate Dave: Yes, please. Send it now.
The Risk Professional: Is your data secure enough for the UK's ICO?
Most Recent - BankingInsuranceSecurities.Com
Sanctions: USA PATRIOT Act designation 20120522Sanctions: OFAC Update 20120515
Sanctions: OFAC update 20120508
Sanctions: OFAC Update 20120517
Sanctions: OFAC Update 20120517 - 2
The sale of Bear Stearns to JP Morgan is not so much as a sign of failure by the BS management, but a signal that the last six months of attempts by the financial services industry, economists and the US Treasury have failed to save the sector from a downturn of catastrophic proportions. Whilst less well known funds have gone under, and funds run by large banks have been baled out, the fact that nothing saved Bear Sterns will dramatically undermine confidence in the US economy.
Emergency measures have not worked - and the latest rate cut, for emergency funding, of just a quarter of one percent will not improve confidence.
The pressure on Bear Stearns is a the opposite side of the coin for the pressure on Carlyle Capital and other funds.
What is happening, behind the facades of Wall Street and other financial centres, is that financial institutions are watching their capital adequacy ratios falling.
When that happens, they must report it to the regulator, and when that happens, rating agencies find out and report that the bank may not be a good credit risk, and when that happens, other banks either stop lending to it or raise the price at which they are prepared to lend, and when that happens, the business runs into trouble, perhaps insurmountable, and when that happens the regulator puts out a call to the very banks that concluded it was not credit worthy and says "will someone step in and take over.
When that happens, one of the biggest ironies of all comes into play: the merchant banks and funds that, in may cases, built their wealth on taking on ailing businesses and breaking them up become the carcase instead of the vulture.
But the risks spread far beyond the USA. Today, the New Zealand Treasury said that it expects its economy to head for a consumer-led recession. New Zealand is one of the few countries in the world that still has interest rate high enough for a substantial reduction to be made - and made in one go. That may stave off recession in a way that the nibbling approach of the USA and the UK, for example, has not.
Businesses in Australia have been quoted as saying that recession is inevitable with a bottoming out in mid 2009.
The contagion effect across the manufacturing sectors in South East Asia may logically be seen to suffer as their major markets unravel.