Outsourcing: payroll services company defrauded customers
A US based outsourcing company has demonstrated that trust is a dangerous thing.
Most Recent - This Section
Outsourcing: Qantas in seven year deal with IBMOutsourcing: are Ireland's problems an indicator for other outsourcing centres?
Outsourcing: Northrop Grumman claims contractor to blame for security breach.
Outsourcing: recession-proof or vulnerable?
Outsourcing: Scottish Icon heads for the hills
Most Recent - Whole Site
Taxation: US Treasury notice re FACTAInternet: "buy this domain or lose business"
The Risk Professional: US Treasury Statement re Iran banking sanctions
Automotive: Clint Eastwood's misty eyes playing for Detroit
Aviation: Kingfisher's finances cause concern
Most Recent - BankingInsuranceSecurities.Com
FI Fraud: Phishing - Santander UKSanctions: OFAC update 20120207
Phishing Alert: Quickbooks / Intuit
Sanctions: OFAC UPDATE 20120206
Sanctions HM Treasury - Iraq
61 year old Michael Thorpe of Groton, Massachusetts has been sentenced to 46 months jail plus three years parole after the Inland Revenue Service uncovered a fraud that netted him USD1.7 million.
Thorpe ran an outsourcing payroll services business called Payroll Express. He had direct debit access to his customers' bank accounts so as to draw down the amount of taxes and other payments due under the customers' payroll.
But in a simple document fraud, he underpaid the Revenue, but sent documents to the customers showing that full deductions were made and accounted for. He sent the Revenue documents evidencing lower than true salaries and therefore lower than true deductions.
Then he transferred the underpaid amounts to another company, GFA Inc., that he controlled.
In total he skimmed off USD1.7 million, and he has been ordered to pay that amount in restitution to his victims. But his victims will still lose out because the Inland Revenue Service has insisted that they pay not only the tax properly due but also penalties and interest, even though they were entirely innocent and believed that the tax had been paid in full and on time.
The scheme only came to light when the IRS concluded that the employers were not declaring correct amounts of pay and contacted them direct. At that point the mismatch in the documentation became apparent.